Thread:Pigman0439/@comment-26547082-20171124115355/@comment-31479721-20171124150820

I would just like to say that there is lots of precedent saying that someone shouldn't be punished or rewarded for doing something outside of the Wiki. For example, when IrishGamer deleted the Wiki YouTube channel, he was not punished, because as Darth said, "It is not right to block someone on Wikia simply because they did something on other platforms. Until and unless they do so, we won't block them." Another time is when Darth said to Kayli that being a staff member on WikiCraft doesn't automatically give her any authority here, or something of the sort. Please do keep past precedent in mind in this discussion, as it is very important to keep with it. If precedent is broken from here, eventually other precedents may be broken from, and this starts a huge domino effect, ending in a lot of chaos. As this scenario is not mentioned in the rules, past precedent must be examined closely, or it would be akin to not punishing someone who breaks the rules for the appropriate amount of time. Also, please do give me a fair trial, and actually speak to the accused parties to understand their motivations. These are my only requests.