User blog comment:PvPMaster2001/Election Reforms/@comment-28905095-20180412160333

This sounds like a very elaborate and bureaucratic way to handle elections for a site with less than 100 active contributors. And most of these are mostly (if not only) interested in doing forum game threads.

What I find valuable in this blog post is that we do need to consider a cleanup up staff to remove/retire/"hibernate" inactive staff. We also need to find a way to activate more members into actually editing the Wiki contents of this site. There is no point in keeping this site alive only to do forum game threads.

Do we need to have a fixed number of staff? No, not in my opinion. Do we need to have regular elections? No. Do we need to have a rigorous election scheme like this? Definitively no.