Thread:Pigman0439/@comment-28606847-20160820185008/@comment-26950832-20160825033854

Darthwikia25 wrote: Sometimes I think some movies would have been better off without sequels. Yep, just like Home Alone. The first 2 were amazing (my favorite is the second), then they made 3 more which did horrible. The third one has NOTHING to do with the first 2, the fourth one has a bit to do with the first 2 but there were new actors that aren't good, and I never watched the fifth, but it has nothing to do with the first 2. If you make a successful movie, and you are planning to make a sequel, but you don't have some of the original actors, don't make it. This doesn't really apply to animated movies, since you can't see them. For example, in Finding Dory, the original actor for Nemo didn't play Nemo in Finding Dory. Well, he grown a lot since, Finding Dory was made 13 years after Finding Nemo. But, he did play a different character whose hardly in the movie. There was a new actor for Nemo. And both movies were a success. I agree with you Darth, some movies are better without sequels.