Thread:Pigman0439/@comment-26547082-20171124115355/@comment-31479721-20171124225836

My defenses/rebuttals:
 * I was a new user, and I thought it was better to edit each section individually as opposed to a full edit. When Darth told me of this mistake, I immediately corrected it, and have not done so since.
 * Once again, correlation and causation are being confused. My activity fluctuates with the times. One real causation is that, for example, the Format Policy was being initiated exactly when the Rollback election was taking place. When my activity went down recently, it's because of schoolwork, and the fact that now I'm actually kinda popular, and I originally joined because I didn't have many friends, so I decided to get online friends instead.
 * At the time, I was surprised he was leaving. I mean, he had told me over Discord just before that, but I thought he meant I in like a few weeks, not a few minutes. I also wanted stability in the Wiki, rather than a huge overturn all at once. And change the word numerous to zero, and that sentence will be correct, as no one ever told me so, and I never pushed my opinion.
 * I have not done so in the past few months, and when requested to stop, I did so.
 * Going past my assigned duties? I've been reverting a few edits and warning the occasional user, is that not what I am supposed to be doing? At times I feel that I've only gained a cool username color as a result of my promotion.
 * Disliking a staff member is something perfectly acceptable and fine. If I disagree with your actions, you cannot punish me for having an opinion, it's a basic human right. I attempt not to speak negatively about staff members in public, this was the only time I've done so. Privately, there's only 1 person I even discuss stuff with, and that is HerobrineAC0318, and most of the time it's discussing math or school stuff, since he doesn't care about the Wiki any more.
 * This is false. Using sockpuppets to achieve a goal is most certainly not okay. Being able to avoid detection if you hypothetically do so is okay though.
 * I didn't see any information from HelenAngel, I've been checking her Twitter for the past few days, and nothing. Your other evidence has been that we don't know for sure, which is not convincing to me.
 * The tweet does not relate to the Wiki, and it doesn't effect how I do my job as a Rollback. Now, were I a Discussions Mod or Admin, I would see your point, but I am not. Asking someone to retract a statement they made which was a lie is perfectly acceptable, and if this occurs in the real world you could be sued for defamation or libel. I do not see why we should not be held to the same standards online, just because there is no threat of being sued.
 * That must be a very small iceberg then if this is the tip. Or maybe a very small tip...Oh God, now I'm imagining a ship sailing, the captain being informed that there are no icebergs in sight, and then right afterwards they hit an iceberg, which they could not see because the tip was like 1/2 a millimeter across or something...