Thread:TheV1ct0ri0u5/@comment-25014034-20160220041452/@comment-25739558-20160222141149

XxMarioLoverxx wrote: Sorry for bumbing in but I think the pages should be protected. I have a few reasons on why. There are some users that edit a page and put in things that aren't right. Users either duplicate things (either do the exact same thing or do it in a different wording) put random things, false info, etc. Yesterday or the day before someone edited the 0.15.0 page and put "the End" without any proof. So I agree with Darth and protect the update pages.

 Mario Lover 23 The issue with that is, it makes the Community feel more closed off when they can't contribute to popular pages. The whole reason we have rollback is to undo vandal edits, and we have users who know what's in these things to edit the false information. If you were to ask any Wikipedia administrator–which Wikipedia has both a strict style and thousands of completed articles. The admins protect as a last resort, just as they do blocking. It makes the community feel unwelcome.