Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-26897006-20150418085855/@comment-32478719-20150421001925

652Graystripe wrote: Dragonballgtgoku wrote:

652Graystripe wrote:

Dragonballgtgoku wrote:

652Graystripe wrote: I think that it's a bad idea to have a council. Admins aren't necessarily a perfect representation of the wiki's community, and they're not any "better" than anyone else. I disagree. You assume a council will make superior to others. The point of a council is to solve problems and make decisions quickly and efficiently. I don't believe a council will make users automatically superior; I just believe that it won't provide an accurate representation. In addition, users shouldn't have to be staff members to be on it. The word choice you used made it sound like that. If done right and has responsible users, councils can prove to be effective. Again, Not all councils are composed of staff. We can use responsible users too. How would the council decide on issues? Responsible and moderated debate or just a straight vote? Debate or vote. Either way. Progress can be made.